Breast Implant Rupture: Causes, Diagnosis and Treatment

Main Article Content

Francisco Javier De la Rosa Burciaga
Héctor Adrián Salas Rivas
Luis Gandhi García Preza
Axel Fabián Vidales Cervantes
Luis David Nava Gómez

Abstract

Breast implant rupture is a rare event that can occur at any time after breast augmentation surgery. The most common causes of rupture are natural aging of the implant, traumatic injury, and failure of the implant material. Symptoms of breast implant rupture can range from mild discomfort to total loss of breast shape and size.


Diagnosing a ruptured breast implant can be challenging, as the condition can be asymptomatic in some cases. However, imaging tests such as MRI and ultrasound can help detect the presence of ruptured implants. Treatment options for ruptured breast implants vary depending on the type of implant, the duration of rupture and the presence of symptoms. In general, treatment involves surgical removal of the ruptured implant and replacement with a new one or complete removal of the implant and surrounding silicone material.


Regular checkups with a board-certified plastic surgeon and being aware of any changes in the shape or feel of the breasts are crucial for early detection and treatment of breast implant rupture. Women considering breast augmentation surgery should carefully weigh the potential risks and benefits of the procedure before undergoing surgery.


Breast implant rupture is a rare but important complication that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment to avoid potential complications. Understanding the causes, symptoms, diagnosis and treatment options for breast implant rupture can help women make informed decisions about breast augmentation surgery and maintain the health of their breasts.

Article Details

How to Cite
De la Rosa Burciaga, F. J., Salas Rivas, H. A., Preza, L. G. G. ., Cervantes, A. F. V., & Gómez, L. D. N. (2023). Breast Implant Rupture: Causes, Diagnosis and Treatment. International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies, 3(05), 857–860. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v3-i5-13
Section
Articles

References

I. American Society of Plastic Surgeons (2022). Breast implant rupture: diagnosis and treatment. Retrieved April 28, 2023, from https://www.plasticsurgery.org/news/blog/breast-implant-rupture-diagnosis-and-treatment.

II. Mayo Clinic (2022). Breast implants: Saline vs. silicone. Retrieved April 28, 2023, fromhttps://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/womens-health/in-depth/breast-implants/art-20045957.

III. Food and Drug Administration (2021). Breast Implants - Certain Labeling Recommendations to Improve Patient Communication: Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. Retrieved April 28, 2023, from https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/breast-implants-certain-labeling-recommendations-improve-patient-communication-guidance-industry-and.

IV. Peters W, Pritzker K, Smith D, et al. Capsular calcification associated with silicone breast implants: incidence, determinants, and characterization. Ann Plast Surg 1998; 41:348-60. 10.1097/00000637-199810000-00002

V. Collis N, Sharpe DT. Silicone gel-filled breast implant integrity: a retrospective review of 478 consecutively explanted implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105:1979-85; discussion 1986-9.

VI. Brown SL, Middleton MS, Berg WA, et al. Prevalence of rupture of silicone gel breast implants revealed on MR imaging in a population of women in Birmingham, Alabama. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:1057-64. 10.2214/ajr.175.4.1751057

VII. 7. Maxwell GP, Gabriel A. The evolution of breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134:12S-7S.10.1097/PRS.0000000000000348

VIII. Handel N, Garcia ME, Wixtrom R. Breast implant rupture: causes, incidence, clinical impact, and management. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132:1128-37. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a4c243

IX. Cunningham B, McCue J. Safety and effectiveness of Mentor's MemoryGel implants at 6 years. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009; 33:440-4. 10.1007/s00266-009-9364-6

X. Health Canada. Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) for MENTOR MEMORYGEL™ CPG BREAST IMPLANTS COHESIVE III. Available online: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/prodpharma/sbd-smd/md-im/sbd_smd_2015_mentorcpg_86150-eng.php

XI. Hammond DC, Migliori MM, Caplin DA, et al. Mentor Contour Profile Gel implants: clinical outcomes at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129:1381-91. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824ecbf0

XII. Spear SL, Murphy DK, Allergan Silicone Breast Implant U.S., Core Clinical Study Group Natrelle round silicone breast implants: Core Study results at 10 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133:1354-61. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000021

XIII. Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Bengtson BP, et al. Ten-year results from the Natrelle 410 anatomical

Most read articles by the same author(s)